Legal Opinion

United States v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company, a Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 10, 1972No. 71-1234PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LYDICK, District Judge:

This is an appeal by the United States of America from a District Court order, 320 F.Supp. 648, denying.it recovery under the California Uninsured Motorist Law and the terms of a policy of insurance issued by Hartford Accident and Indemnity Company to Willard J. Rogers and his wife. The United States seeks recovery of medical benefits paid by the United States to Mrs. Rogers as a serviceman’s wife under the Federal Medical Care Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2651 et seq.

The facts, briefly stated, are: Hartford issued to Mr. and Mrs. Rogers, residents of California, an…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. SummerlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Williams v. Los Angeles Metropolitan Transit AuthorityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. Firemen's Insurance v. DiskinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  5. Pacific Indem. Co. v. OrnellasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. United States v. RezzonicoDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1998
  2. United States v. State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  3. United States v. Franklin StudivantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
  4. Spear v. California State Automobile Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Resolution Trust Corp. v. OlsonDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1991

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API