Legal Opinion

Oklahoma Coal Co. v. Atkinson

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 16, 1926No. 16387PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLester, J.

The parties will be referred to as they appeared in the court below.

This action was commenced by plaintiffs against the defendant and the Consolidated Fuel Company in the superior court of Ok-mulgee county, and thereafter the cause was transferred to the district court of Okmul-gee countyi.

The plaintiffs alleged in their petition that they were engaged in the occupation of mining coal, and assert that they had performed work and labor in the mines operated by Consolidated Fuel Company, and that said company had made default in the payment of their wages for labor performed. They prayed…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  2. Trustees', Executors' & Securities Ins. v. HootonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Blevins v. W. A. Graham Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  4. Stiles, Treasurer v. City of GuthrieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
  5. Ledegar v. BockovenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Protest of Chicago, R, I. & P. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
  2. Dowell v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  3. Silmon v. RahhalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  4. Wagner v. SwanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  5. Dancy v. PeeblySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API