Legal Opinion
Dancy v. Peebly
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 28, 1928No. 19589PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLester, J.
The plaintiffs have filed in this court an original action praying that this court by writ of mandamus compel the county election board of Oklahoma county, Okla., to include and have printed upon the Republican primary ballots in said Oklahoma county, Okla., at the ensuing August primary, the names of each of said plaintiffs as candidates for the primary nomination for the particular office sought by each of said plaintiffs.
The plaintiffs allege for their cause of action:
“That they and each of them are residents of Oklahoma county, state of Oklahoma; that they are duly qualified electors…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Newberry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- De Graffenreid v. Iowa Land & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Trustees', Executors' & Securities Ins. v. HootonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Dabney v. HookerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Craig v. BondSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- State Ex Rel. Williamson v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Maddox v. HuntSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Kerr v. LuttrellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- State Ex Rel. Smith v. State Election BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.