Legal Opinion
Protest of Chicago, R, I. & P. Ry. Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 25, 1929No. 20263PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSjWINDALL, J.
We have for consideration here an appeal from' the Court of Tax Review of the state of Oklahoma. In this opinion the Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company will be referred to as protestant, and the county excise board of Pittsburg county will be referred to as pro-testee. The county excise board of Pitts-burg county made and certified to the State Auditor, among others, tax levies for the fiscal year 1928-29 as follows: City of Hartshome, .50 mill for cemetery purposes; city of McAlester, .50 mill for cemetery purposes, 1 mill for library purposes. These levies were included in the…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. Corporation CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Coyle v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Bd. of Com'rs of Creek v. Alexander, St. TreasurerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Maben v. RosserSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- De Hasque v. Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Courtney v. CourtneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- C. D. Coggeshall & Co. v. SmileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Resolution Trust Corp. v. GreerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- WRG Construction Co. v. HoebelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1979
- Travelers Insurance Co. v. L v. French Truck Service, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.