Legal Opinion

Casady v. Scott

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1924PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilliam A. Lee, J.

This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing appellants’ action, on the ground that their third amended complaint fails to state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The action was begun February 7, 1921, and after a motion to strike parts of the complaint and demurrers thereto, which preliminary pleas were in part sustained, appellants asked leave and were granted permission to file an amended complaint which was filed June 24, 1921. Respondents demurred to this amended complaint and appellants filed a second amended complaint, to which demurrers were interposed and sustained,…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Zellner v. WassmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Ex Parte SimonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  3. Morrison v. LandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. Bridge v. KedonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Rogers v. DuhartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Bethlahmy v. BechtelIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Schlieff v. BistlineIdaho Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Addy v. StewartIdaho Supreme Court · 1949
  4. McShane v. QuillinIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Gould v. HillIdaho Supreme Court · 1926

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API