Legal Opinion

Schlieff v. Bistline

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 17, 1932No. 5890PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEEPER, J. —

On June 29, 1929, Herman Schlieff and Paul Bistline, who were stockholders, directors and officers of the Consumers Oil Company, an Idaho corporation, entered into a written contract with the Utah Oil Refining Company, a Utah corporation, for the sale of all of the assets of the Consumers Company to a new corporation to be formed by the latter for the express purpose of taking over the business. The contract was ratified by the stockholders of the Consumers Company and thereafter carried out, its details being of no concern in this litigation except as hereafter stated. Among the…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Perry v. . DickersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
  2. Dover Lumber Co. v. CaseIdaho Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Lee Tung v. BurkhartOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Burke Land & Livestock Co. v. Wells, Fargo & Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Bates v. Capital State BankIdaho Supreme Court · 1912

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Bethlahmy v. BechtelIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Anderson v. WhippleIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Boesiger v. FreerIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Klam v. KoppelIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Peasley Transfer & Storage Co. v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1999

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API