Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Duhart

California Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1893No. 19093PublishedCited by 35 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtPaterson, J.

The complaint alleges that the executors of the estate of Miguel Leonis let and demised unto the plaintiff certain lands belonging to the estate for the term of eight months from and after February 1, 1891, and thereupon plaintiff took possession of and has ever since held the same; that on February 1, 1891, the defendant “ entered upon the plaintiff’s said described property, and drove into and kept upon the said land about four hundred head of cattle and about three thousand head of sheep, and trod down and depastured and destroyed all the grass and herbage thereon, and so kept the said…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Goulet v. . AsselerNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  2. Brown v. BridgesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1870
  3. Jones v. CortesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1861
  4. Page v. FowlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  5. Holman v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Bollinger v. National Fire InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Coastal Oil & Gas Corp. v. Garza Energy TrustTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Mangini v. Aerojet-General Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1991
  4. Buxbom v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. Zellner v. WassmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API