Legal Opinion

Wanstrom v. North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 2001No. 20000187PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Orlyn Wanstrom appealed from a district court judgment affirming a North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau denial of Wanstrom’s claim for disability benefits. The Bureau concluded Wanstrom’s employment as a firefighter was not a substantial contributing factor in the causation of his lung disease, therefore the N.D.C.C. § 65-01-02(18)(d) presumption his lung condition was suffered in the line of duty was successfully rebutted and Wanstrom did not have a compensable injury. We conclude reasoning minds reasonably could not have determined the presumption was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Robertson v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Negaard-Cooley v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Sunderland v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. McDaniel v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Renault v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Adamson v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Paul v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Spivey v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 2017
  4. Byous v. Missouri Local Government Employees Retirement System Board of TrusteesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  5. Myhre v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API