Wanstrom v. North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Orlyn Wanstrom appealed from a district court judgment affirming a North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau denial of Wanstrom’s claim for disability benefits. The Bureau concluded Wanstrom’s employment as a firefighter was not a substantial contributing factor in the causation of his lung disease, therefore the N.D.C.C. § 65-01-02(18)(d) presumption his lung condition was suffered in the line of duty was successfully rebutted and Wanstrom did not have a compensable injury. We conclude reasoning minds reasonably could not have determined the presumption was…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Robertson v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Negaard-Cooley v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Sunderland v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- McDaniel v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Renault v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Adamson v. Municipality of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 2014
- Paul v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Spivey v. City of BellevueWashington Supreme Court · 2017
- Byous v. Missouri Local Government Employees Retirement System Board of TrusteesMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- Myhre v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.