McDaniel v. North Dakota Workers Compensation Bureau
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MESCHKE, Justice.
[¶ 1] Gary McDaniel appealed a judgment affirming the Workers Compensation Bureau’s denial of benefits for his bladder cancer that he claims was presumptively caused by his work as a firefighter. We reverse and remand for further fact-finding on why substantial medical evidence favorable to McDaniel was ignored, and to apply the correct law of causation.
[¶ 2] McDaniel, a fireman for the City of Minot for over twenty-seven years, fought an average of fifty to one hundred active fires each year. Those fires, he asserts, exposed him to a significant amount of toxic fumes and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- McAllister v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Satrom v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
- Sunderland v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Syverson v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Flermoen v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Flink v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Robertson v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Negaard-Cooley v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Shiek v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Zueger v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.