Legal Opinion
Executive Art Studio, Inc. v. City of Grand Rapids
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided October 9, 2001No. 2:01-cv-00196PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
QUIST, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Executive Arts Studio, Inc. d/b/a Velvet Touch (“Executive Arts”), filed this action seeking declaratory and injunctive relief against Defendant, the City of Grand Rapids (the “City”). In its first amended complaint, Executive Arts alleges, among other things, that Ordinance No. 77-31, being that part of the City’s Zoning Ordinance which regulates adult businesses, and Ordinance No. 01-07, which amended the definition of “adult bookstore” under the City’s Zoning Ordinance, are unconstitutional both facially and as applied to Executive Arts. Now before…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Patsy v. Board of Regents of Fla.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Executive Arts Studio, Inc., D/B/A Velvet Touch v. City of Grand RapidsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Michigan Chamber of Commerce v. LandDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2010
- Executive Arts Studio, Inc. v. City of Grand RapidsDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 2002
- Brown v. DayDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2007
- Exec Arts Studio v. Grand RapidsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004