Legal Opinion
Executive Arts Studio, Inc. v. City of Grand Rapids
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided August 30, 2002No. 1:01-cr-00196PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
QUIST, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Executive Arts Studio, Inc. d/b/a Velvet Touch (“Executive Arts”), filed this action seeking declaratory and injunctive relief against Defendant, the City of Grand Rapids (the “City”). In its first amended complaint, Executive Arts alleges, among other things, that Ordinance No. 77-31, being that part of the City’s Zoning Ordinance which regulates adult businesses, and Ordinance No. 01-07, which amended the definition of “adult bookstore” under the City’s Zoning Ordinance, are unconstitutional as applied to Executive Arts. Now before the Court are…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Executive Arts Studio, Inc., D/B/A Velvet Touch v. City of Grand RapidsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- World Wide Video of Washington, Inc. v. City of SpokaneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Truckor v. Erie TownshipMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
- ATM Exp., Inc. v. City of Montgomery, AlabamaDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2005
- BIG DIPPER ENTERTAINMENT, LLC. v. City of WarrenDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.