Poy v. Allan
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.
Plaintiffs, copartners, doing business as the Oriental Cafe, in Detroit, sued defendant to recover damages, alleged to have been suffered by them by reason of defendant’s alleged fraudulent conduct while employed by plaintiffs as a broker. The case was once dismissed for nonjoinder and misjoinder of parties plaintiff. The order of dismissal was reversed here with leave under the statute, section 12364, 3 Comp. Laws 1915, to amend. Poy v. Allan, 247 Mich. 385. Defendant pleaded the general issue and gave notice of the statute of limitations, res adjudicata by the decision in Poy v. Allan, 231…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Bond v. MarkstrumMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Vyse v. RichardsMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Bryant v. KenyonMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
- Pagenkoff v. Patrons' Mutual Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
- Briggs v. MilburnMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bankers Trust Co. v. RussellMichigan Supreme Court · 1935
- Youdan v. KelleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1934