Legal Opinion

Vyse v. Richards

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1919No. Docket No. 37PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Appeal from Wayne; Hart (Burton L.), J., presiding. Bill by Charles Vyse and others against Mary A. Richards and another to impress a trust upon real estate and for an accounting. From an order overruling a motion to dismiss, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

(after stating the facts). In this court it is urged on behalf of the defendants, and the questions raised by the motion to dismiss are: (1) that the cause of action is barred by the statute of limitations; and (2) that the decree in the case brought by the administrator of the estate of Charles L. Fish, deceased, against these defendants and Tillie A. Vyse is res adjudicata. Plaintiffs insist that these questions may not be raised on this record by motion to dismiss.

By section 4, chapter 14, Act No. 314, Pub. Acts 1915 (3 Comp. Laws 1915, § 12456), demurrers, pleas in abatement, and pleas to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Renackowsky v. Board of Water CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  2. First National Bank v. SteelMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Gunn v. GunnMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Pagenkoff v. Patrons' Mutual Fire InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Shank v. WoodworthMichigan Supreme Court · 1897

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Sandusky Grain Co. v. Borden's Condensed Milk Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Kralick v. ShuttleworthIdaho Supreme Court · 1930
  3. The Epworth Assembly v. Ludington & Northern RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Johnson v. Wells-Lamson Quarry Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1931
  5. Haney v. Grand Rapids Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1922

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API