Legal Opinion

Conrad v. City of Thornton

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided August 23, 1976No. C-721PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kelley

We granted certiorari to review the court of appeals decision in Conrad v. City of Thornton, 36 Colo. App. 22, 536 P.2d 855 (1975), which held that a home rule city does not have authority to contract with its firemen and policemen for the refund of their individual pension fund contributions upon termination of employment. We disagree with the holding of the court of appeals and therefore reverse.

The underlying facts in this case are not disputed. On February 28, 1972, plaintiff Conrad began employment with the fire department of the City of Thornton (City), a home rule city. At the time he…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Howe v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
  2. People v. LeeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973
  3. Vela v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1971
  4. Creps v. Board of Firemen's Relief & Retirement Fund TrusteesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
  5. Sommers v. PattonIllinois Supreme Court · 1948

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Martinez v. Continental EnterprisesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  2. People v. TaggartSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  3. Brown v. City And County OfCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
  4. Colorado State Board of Medical Examiners v. JorgensenSupreme Court of Colorado · 1979
  5. City and County of Denver v. StateSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API