Legal Opinion

Brown v. McClennen ex rel. County of Maricopa

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 2016No. CV-15-0042-PRPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Justice TIMMER,

opinion of the Court:

¶ 1 Although the Fourth Amendment generally prohibits warrantless searches, they are permitted if there is free and voluntary consent to search. Schneckloth v. Bustamonte, 412 U.S. 218, 219, 93 S.Ct. 2041, 36 L.Ed.2d 854 (1973); State v. Butler, 232 Ariz. 84, 87 ¶ 13, 302 P.3d 609, 612 (2013). Consent cannot be given “freely and voluntarily” if the subject of a search merely acquiesces to a claim of lawful authority. Bumper v. North Carolina, 391 U.S. 543, 548-49, 88 S.Ct. 1788, 20 L.Ed.2d 797 (1968).

¶ 2 Arizona’s implied consent law for watercraft…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  5. United States v. Rodolfo EchegoyenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State of Arizona v. Anthony Lito HernandezArizona Supreme Court · 2018
  2. State v. WeaklandCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
  3. State of Arizona v. Ian MitchamArizona Supreme Court · 2024
  4. State of Arizona v. Anthony Lito HernandezArizona Supreme Court · 2018
  5. State v. BrissetteCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API