Legal Opinion

State v. Weakland

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided November 28, 2017No. 2 CA-CR 2016-0186PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELLY, Judge:

¶ 1 Courtney Weakland appeals from her convictions for aggravated driving under the influence (DUI) while impaired to the slightest degree and aggravated driving with a blood alcohol concentration of .08 or more. She contends the trial court should have suppressed the results of blood-alcohol testing because police officers obtained her blood sample without a warrant and without valid consent. Although we agree the sample was unlawfully obtained, we conclude the officers acted in good faith, and exclusion of the evidence therefore was not required.

Factual and Procedural Background

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. United States v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Missouri v. McNeelySupreme Court of the United States · 2013

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State of Arizona v. Courtney Noelle WeaklandArizona Supreme Court · 2019
  2. Soza v. MarnerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API