Blinn v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BARTEAU, Judge
Jean S. Blinn appeals Ms conviction following a jury trial of operating a veMcle while intoxicated. He raises the following issues:
1. Whether the trial court erred in admitting Blinn’s serum alcohol content rather than Ms blood alcohol content as proof of intoxication?
2. Whether the trial court erred in admitting expert testimony that conflicted with Indiana case law regarding the relationship between serum alcohol content and blood alcohol content?
3. Whether the State presented sufficient evidence to support the conviction?
FACTS
On November 16,1994, Audrey Arnold was…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Smith v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
- Martinez v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1990
- Melton v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
- Mehidal v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1993
- Kremer v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Outlaw v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- State v. RansIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Vanderlinden v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- Staley v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- McGarrity v. Berlin Metals, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2002
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.