Legal Opinion
Outlaw v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided December 18, 2009No. 49A02-0904-CR-340PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NAJAM, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
In this appeal, Curtis Outlaw asserts that the State failed to present sufficient evidence to support his conviction of operating a vehicle while intoxicated, as a Class A misdemeanor. We reverse. 1
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On January 7, 2009, Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department Officer Joel Anderson initiated a traffic stop of a vehicle that lacked a properly illuminated license plate. Outlaw was driving that vehicle, which bad three other occupants. Upon approaching the driver's window, Officer Anderson noticed that both Outlaw's car and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jones v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2003
- Vanderlinden v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- Staley v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Fought v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
- Blinn v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Tin Thang v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
- Vanderlinden v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- Outlaw v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2010
- David Sesay v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
- Temperly v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.