Legal Opinion

Mehidal v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 9, 1993No. 71A05-9212-CR-431PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUCKER, Judge.

Amarree H. Mehidal appeals his convictions and sentences for Operating a Vehicle while Intoxicated Resulting in Serious Bodily Injury to Another ("OWI Bodily Injury) 1 , and Operating a Vehicle while Intoxicated with a Prior Conviction of Operating a Vehicle while Intoxicated ("OWI with a Prior") 2 , both Class D felonies. He raises the following rephrased issues:

1. Did the trial court err in admitting into evidence opinion testimony as to whether Mehidal was intoxicated?

2. Did the trial court err in admitting into evidence testimony concerning the method used in gathering and…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Elmore v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Zachary v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Kelly v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1988

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Pickens v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
  2. Datzek v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Kellett v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Combs v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Reeves v. Boyd & Sons, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API