Legal Opinion
Best v. Schoemehl
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided May 24, 1983No. 46026PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REINHARD, Judge.
Plaintiff appeals from the granting of defendants’ motion to dismiss her damage suit for injuries sustained in a vehicular collision.
The scope of review on a motion to dismiss requires that we examine the pleadings allowing them their broadest intendment, treating all facts alleged as true and construing the allegations favorably to plaintiff. Porter v. Crawford & Co., 611 S.W.2d 265, 266 (Mo.App.1980). Plaintiff filed her second amended petition naming as defendants Mayor Vincent Schoemehl, Thomas Purcell, Homer Sayad, Charles Val-ier, and Robert Wintersmith, as members of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bartley v. Special School District of St. Louis CountySupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
- Porter v. Crawford & Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1980
- Jackson v. WilsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979
- Oberkramer v. City of EllisvilleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
- Spires v. EdgarSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Roberts v. Sewerage and Water Bd.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- Edwards v. BaerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
- Boever v. Special School District of Saint Louis CountyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
- Baker v. City of Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- DOE a v. Special Sch. Dist. of St. Louis CountyDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1986
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.