Legal Opinion
JEM Marketing v. Cellular Telecommunications Industry Ass'n
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided February 5, 1998PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
BAIME, P.J.A.D.
Plaintiff JEM Marketing, LLC brought this action against defendants Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association, Motorola Corporation, and Professional Securities Bureau Ltd. alleging violations of the New Jersey Antitrust Act (N.J.S.A 56:9-1 to -19), racketeering under the New Jersey Racketeering statute (RICO Act) (N.J.S.A. 2C:41-1 to -6.2), conspiracy, tortious interference with economic advantage, malicious prosecution, and libel and slander. The principal thrust of plaintiffs claim was that defendants conspired to make false…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Copperweld Corp. v. Independence Tube Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Printing Mart-Morristown v. Sharp Electronics Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
- Perma Life Mufflers, Inc. v. International Parts Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Kiefer-Stewart Co. v. Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Elliot Fineman the Industry Network System, Inc. v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Brunson v. Affinity Federal Credit UnionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
- Helmy v. City of Jersey CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2003
- JASON CAMPBELL VS. KELLEY LAVERY (L-3366-18, PASSAIC COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2021
- JOHN FALAT, JR. VS. THE COUNTY OF HUNTERDON (L-0188-15, SUSSEX COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018
- SULLIVAN v. BOROUGH OF ATLANTIC HIGHLANDSDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022