Legal Opinion

Helmy v. City of Jersey City

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided December 15, 2003PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Long

A jury returned a verdict in favor of plaintiff Mohamed Helmy in connection with his claim for malicious prosecution against defendants, City of Jersey City, Jersey City Police Department and certain police officers. The trial court granted judgment notwithstanding the verdict (JNOV) and the Appellate Division affirmed. The gravamen of both opinions is that a disconnection between the jury’s finding regarding Helmy’s false arrest claim coupled with a directed verdict in favor of defendants on that count rendered the malicious prosecution verdict inconsistent and therefore invalid. We granted…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Estate of Roach v. Trw, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
  2. Lind v. SchmidSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
  3. Zalewski v. GallagherNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
  4. Galafaro v. KuenstlerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  5. JEM Marketing v. Cellular Telecommunications Industry Ass'nNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Brunson v. Affinity Federal Credit UnionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
  2. Jobes v. EvangelistaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2004
  3. Geissler v. City of Atlantic CityDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2016
  4. Pomykacz v. Borough of West WildwoodDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2006
  5. Investors Sav. v. Waldo JerseyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API