Freeman v. Seligson
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
1Per curiam
Judge Robinson files an opinion in Parts I through V of which Chief Judge Bazelon and Judge Leventhal concur. Judge Leventhal files an opinion in which Chief Judge Bazelon concurs, Judge Robinson dissenting for the reasons stated in Part VI of his opinion. Thus Parts I through V of Judge Robinson’s opinion and Judge Leventhal’s opinion together constitute the opinion of the court. In No. 20,478, the order appealed from is reversed and the case is remanded to the District Court for proceedings not inconsistent with that opinion. In No. 20,482, the appeal is dismissed as moot.
So ordered.
SPOTTSWO…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. American Trucking AssociationsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Bowles v. Seminole Rock & Sand Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by106 opinions
- Mead Data Central, Inc. v. United States Department of the Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977
- Gary A. Soucie v. Edward E. David, Jr., Director, Office of Science and TechnologyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1971
- Duplan Corporation v. Deering Milliken, Inc.District Court, D. South Carolina · 1974
- Richard A. Farnsworth v. The Procter & Gamble Company v. Center for Disease Control, Movant/appelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Claxton L. Burns, on Behalf of Himself and Others Similarly Situated v. Thiokol Chemical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
101 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.