Legal Opinion
Richard A. Farnsworth v. The Procter & Gamble Company v. Center for Disease Control, Movant/appellee
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided April 29, 1985No. 84-8330PublishedCited by 180 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RONEY, Circuit Judge:
Procter and Gamble (P & G) appeals from a discovery protective order granted by the district court under Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(c) denying it access to the names and addresses of women who gave the Center for Disease Control (Center) personal information as participants in the Center’s Toxic Shock Syndrome (TSS) studies. The sole issue on appeal is whether the order was within the district court’s discretion. 101 F.R.D. 355. We affirm.
Plaintiffs filed product liability actions in United States District Courts in Massachusetts, Missouri, Washington, New Mexico, Wisconsin, Indiana…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Blackmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Muller v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Warren McCleskey Cross-Appellant v. Ralph Kemp, Warden, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- Premium Service Corporation v. The Sperry & Hutchinson Company, George A. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by180 opinions
- Michael D. Van Etten v. Bridgestone/Firestone, IncCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- Citizens First National Bank of Princeton v. Cincinnati Insurance Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Susan Liese v. Indian River County Hospital DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
- In Re Alexander Grant & Co. Litigation, (Esm-1). Appeal of News and Sun-Sentinel Co. And John EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- Antonio Carrizosa v. Chiquita Brands InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2020
175 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.