Mojica v. Automatic Employees Credit Union
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION and JUDGMENT ORDER
AUSTIN, District Judge.
This action seeks a declaratory judgment that the automobile repossession and resale provisions of the Illinois Com mercial Code are unconstitutional and further requests a permanent injunction against their enforcement. Plaintiffs contend that the statutes in question violate their rights, under the fourth, fifth, and fourteenth amendments, to notice, an opportunity to be heard, and an impartial determination of right to title before repossession of an automobile. Since a permanent injunction of state statutes is sought, a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Samuel Bailey v. Joe T. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Joseph B. KAUFFMAN Et Al. v. the DREYFUS FUND, INC., Et Al., Investors Diversified Services, Inc., Et Al., AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- Local No. 8-6, Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers International Union v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Progress Development Corporation, a Corporation and Modern Community Developers, Inc., a Corporation v. James C. MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1961
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gonzalez v. Automatic Employees Credit UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- King v. South Jersey National BankSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
- Caesar v. KiserDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1975
- Chicago City Bank & Trust Co. v. AndersonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
- King v. South Jersey National BankSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974