Legal Opinion

King v. South Jersey National Bank

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided December 10, 1974Published

1Opinion of the Court

66 N.J. 161 (1974)

330 A.2d 1

WILLIAM B. KING, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

SOUTH JERSEY NATIONAL BANK, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Reargued September 9, 1974.

Decided December 10, 1974.

Mr. Allen S. Zeller, of Camden Regional Legal Services, argued the cause for the plaintiff-appellant; Messrs. Saul Ferster and Carl S. Bisgaier, on the brief.

Messrs. William E. Reifsteck and Jack N. Hill argued the cause for defendant-respondent; Messrs. Farr, Reifsteck & Wolf, attorneys.

The opinion of the Court was delivered by HUGHES, C.J.

Challenging as invalid the repossession of an…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited124 opinions

  1. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  4. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  5. Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970

119 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API