King v. South Jersey National Bank
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
66 N.J. 161 (1974)
330 A.2d 1
WILLIAM B. KING, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
SOUTH JERSEY NATIONAL BANK, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Reargued September 9, 1974.
Decided December 10, 1974.
Mr. Allen S. Zeller, of Camden Regional Legal Services, argued the cause for the plaintiff-appellant; Messrs. Saul Ferster and Carl S. Bisgaier, on the brief.
Messrs. William E. Reifsteck and Jack N. Hill argued the cause for defendant-respondent; Messrs. Farr, Reifsteck & Wolf, attorneys.
The opinion of the Court was delivered by HUGHES, C.J.
Challenging as invalid the repossession of an…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited124 opinions
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
119 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.