Legal Opinion

People v. Paul V. S.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 5, 1990PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

The evidence at trial, when viewed in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Malizia, 62 NY2d 755, cert denied 469 US 932), is sufficient to support the jury’s verdict finding defendant guilty of criminally negligent homicide for failing to perceive a substantial and unjustifiable risk that death would result from his operation of a motor vehicle when that failure was a gross deviation from the ordinary standard of care (see, Penal Law §§ 125.10, 15.05 [4]; People v Ricardo *945B., 73 NY2d 228,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. MaliziaNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. People v. BoutinNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. People v. Ricardo B.New York Court of Appeals · 1989

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. BoutinNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. People v. LoughlinNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  3. People v. CabreraNew York Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. People v. LewisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  5. People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API