Harambasic v. Owens
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KLEINSCHMIDT, Judge.
This is an appeal from an order of the trial court granting a landowner a prescriptive appurtenant easement over a neighbor’s property. We reaffirm the rule that when a person uses an easement over the land of another in an open, visible, continuous and unmolested manner, there is a presumption that the use is hostile to the title of the owner of the land, and under a claim of right, as opposed to the use being permissive.
The Harambasics and the Owenses own adjoining parcels of land in southern Yavapai County. The Harambasics acquired their land in 1973 and the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Clarke v. ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Warsaw v. Chicago Metallic Ceilings, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1984
- Glantz v. GabelMontana Supreme Court · 1923
- Larue v. KosichArizona Supreme Court · 1947
- MacDonald Properties, Inc. v. Bel-Air Country ClubCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Paxson v. GlovitzCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- Spaulding v. PouliotCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Bunyard v. US, Dept. of Agriculture, Forest ServiceDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2004
- Pat Spaulding v. Michael PouliotCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Schugg v. Az Brd of RegentsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014