Paxson v. Glovitz
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EHRLICH, Judge.
¶ 1 Alvera Paxson and her attorney, Stephen L. Cox, appeal a summary judgment granted Robert J. Glovitz by the superior court, thus denying Paxson relief in her action to establish a prescriptive easement over real property owned by Glovitz. The court declared that the easement was a permissive one, and it awarded Glovitz attorneys’ fees from Paxson and Cox jointly and severally. We find, however, that a prescriptive easement was established as a matter of law, and, therefore, we reverse the judgment and remand this case.
FACTS AND RELEVANT PROCEEDINGS
¶2 The material…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Campbell v. WestdahlCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
- Pinkerton v. PritchardArizona Supreme Court · 1950
- Tenney v. LuplowArizona Supreme Court · 1968
- Ammer v. Arizona Water Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
- Spillsbury v. School District No. 19Arizona Supreme Court · 1930
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Mattson v. Montana Power Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2009
- Dabrowski v. BartlettCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
- Spaulding v. PouliotCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Tumacacori Mission Land Development, Ltd. v. Union Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- Bunyard v. US, Dept. of Agriculture, Forest ServiceDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2004
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.