Legal Opinion

Paxson v. Glovitz

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 25, 2002No. 1-CA-CV-01-0571PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EHRLICH, Judge.

¶ 1 Alvera Paxson and her attorney, Stephen L. Cox, appeal a summary judgment granted Robert J. Glovitz by the superior court, thus denying Paxson relief in her action to establish a prescriptive easement over real property owned by Glovitz. The court declared that the easement was a permissive one, and it awarded Glovitz attorneys’ fees from Paxson and Cox jointly and severally. We find, however, that a prescriptive easement was established as a matter of law, and, therefore, we reverse the judgment and remand this case.

FACTS AND RELEVANT PROCEEDINGS

¶2 The material…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Campbell v. WestdahlCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
  2. Pinkerton v. PritchardArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Tenney v. LuplowArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Ammer v. Arizona Water Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  5. Spillsbury v. School District No. 19Arizona Supreme Court · 1930

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mattson v. Montana Power Co.Montana Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Dabrowski v. BartlettCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
  3. Spaulding v. PouliotCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  4. Tumacacori Mission Land Development, Ltd. v. Union Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  5. Bunyard v. US, Dept. of Agriculture, Forest ServiceDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API