Bunyard v. US, Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service
District Court, D. Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED ORDER
TEILBORG, District Judge.
IT IS ORDERED that the Court’s Order of February 4, 2004 (Doc. # 45) is amended, effective as of the original date of the Order, to read as follows:
Pending before the Court are Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Doe. # 32) (“Motion”) and Defendant’s Response to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment and Cross Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 37) (“Cross Motion”). The Court held oral argument on January 26, 2004, and has carefully considered the parties’ arguments, motions, responses, and replies. As discussed below, the Court will grant…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Kinscherff v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
- Adams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Barnes v. BabbittDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2004
- Friends of the Columbia Gorge, Inc. v. United States Forest ServiceDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2008
- Sibling Rivalry Diverse Services, LLC v. City of Boise, a political subdivision of the State of Idaho; United States of America; and United States of America Bureau of Land Management, a governmental entityDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2026