Legal Opinion

State v. Vaughn

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided July 6, 1988No. C-2671; CA A42629PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled substance, ORS 475.992, assigning as error the trial court’s denial of his motion to suppress. The trial court upheld the warrantless search under the so-called automobile exception. We hold that there was no lawful basis for a warrantless search and reverse and remand.

As part of an undercover narcotics investigation, Cummings, an undercover officer, contacted Graven, a known drug dealer, to buy a pound of marijuana. Graven indicated that he could get the marijuana through his “man” in Emmett, Idaho. He arranged for his “man” to…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. OwensOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. CaraherOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  4. State v. AnspachOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State v. KockOregon Supreme Court · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. McCarthyOregon Supreme Court · 2021
  2. State v. CromwellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  3. State v. RamirezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  4. State v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
  5. State v. GiffenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API