Legal Opinion

State v. Greene

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1979No. 76-11-109, CA 8035, SC 25650PublishedCited by 91 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*339DENECKE, C. J.

We granted review in this and three other cases in order to attempt to clarify the law relating to the search and seizure of vehicles. State v. Fondren, 30 Or App 1045, 568 P2d 721 (1977); State v. Downes, 31 Or App 419, 571 P2d 914 (1977); State v. Groda, 32 Or App 287, 573 P2d 1269 (1978).

We are governed by the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States and § 9, Art I, of the Oregon Constitution. With few exceptions not pertinent here, Oregon statutes do not attempt to cover searches and seizures without a warrant.

We must accord the defendant at least as much…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  4. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  5. Chambers v. MaroneySupreme Court of the United States · 1970

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by91 opinions

  1. State v. CaraherOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Sterling v. CuppOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  4. State v. QuinnOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  5. State v. AtkinsonOregon Supreme Court · 1984

86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API