State v. . Hanner
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1ConcurrenceClark, C. J.
The defendant was indicted in the Court below for selling liquor without a license. The jury returned a special verdict in which they found that the defendant did not have a license to sell liquor. They further find that the testimony of the witnesses is true. James Eastep testified that he applied to the defendant for the purchase of a gallon of whiskey and was told by him that he could let him have a gallon for two dollars, express charges prepaid. The witness paid defendant two dollars, who gave him a receipt, as follows: "Dock Eastep. One gal., $2.00. Paid. W. L. H." When the defendant…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- State v. . BrittainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
- State v. . BlueSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
- State v. . BraySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
- State v. . CusterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1871
- State v. . CurtisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. of Texas v. PaceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Commercial Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932
- State v. . GulledgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- State v. GulledgeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.