Legal Opinion
United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Commercial Nat. Bank
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided January 20, 1932No. 6262PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.
Appellee, plaintiff below, brought this suit against the United States Fidelity & Guaranty Company on a fidelity schedule bond executed by that company insuring the bank against loss caused by any of the employees listed in the schedule, to the extent of the amount for which that employee was bonded. The bond gives the employer the right, under conditions set out in the policy, to add the names of additional employees, and to increase or dimmish the amount of insurance. The provisions pertinent to this suit and much ai-gued at the bar are: (1) “The insurer in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hodges v. EastonSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Ward v. CochranSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Standard Sewing Machine Co. v. Royal InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1902
- American Surety Co. of New York v. ShawCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931
- State v. HannerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Teodore Dorotee Autera v. Manuel Dudley Robinson, Anthony C. Autera v. Manuel Dudley RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- Western Fire Ins. Co. of Fort Scott, Kan. v. WordCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1942
- Hubshman v. Louis Keer Shoe Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Commercial Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1933
- United Gas Public Service Co. v. PardueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935