Legal Opinion

Planned Parenthood Southeast, Inc. v. Strange

District Court, M.D. Alabama

Decided March 25, 2016No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:13cv405-MHTPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

■ Myron H. Thompson,..-UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Previously, this court found that an Alabama statute that requires abortion providers to obtain staff privileges at a local hospital unconstitutionally restricts the rights of women seeking abortions in Alabama, Planned Parenthood Se., Inc. v. Strange (Strange III), 33 F.Supp.3d 1330, 1378 (M.D.Ala.2014) (Thompson, J.); see also Planned Parenthood Se., Inc. v. Strange (Strange II), 9 F.Supp.3d 1272 (M.D.Ala.2014) (Thompson, J.) (summary judgment opinion laying the foundation for the application of the undue-burden test in this case);…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  5. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. West Alabama Women's Center v. MillerDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2016
  2. West Alabama Women's Center v. MillerDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2016
  3. W. Ala. Women's Ctr. v. MillerDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2017
  4. Reproductive Health Services v. MarshallDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2017
  5. Planned Parenthood Southwest Ohio Region v. YostDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API