Legal Opinion
Reproductive Health Services v. Marshall
District Court, M.D. Alabama
Decided July 28, 2017No. CASE NO. 2:14-cv-1014-SRWPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION, DECLARATORY JUDGMENT, AND ORDER1
Susan Russ Walker, United States Magistrate Judge
This matter is before the court on the parties’ cross motions for judgment on the pleadings.
I. Introduction
On September 2, 2016, the court determined that a justiciable controversy exists in this case with respect to plaintiffs’ challenges to the State of Alabama’s parental consent and judicial bypass statutes (“the Act”), which were substantially amended in 2014. See Reproductive Health Services v. Strange, 204 F.Supp.3d 1300 (M.D. Ala. 2016) (“RHS I”);2 see also Ala. Code §§ 26-21-1, et…
2Cases cited69 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Reproductive Health Services v. Daryl D. BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
- W. Ala. Women's Ctr. v. MillerDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2017
- Reproductive Health Services v. Daryl D. BaileyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021