Legal Opinion

Planned Parenthood Southwest Ohio Region v. Yost

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided January 2, 2020No. 1:19-cv-00118Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF OHIO WESTERN DIVISION AT CINCINNATI Planned Parenthood Southwest Ohio ) Region, et al., ) ) Case No.: 1:19-cv-00118 Plaintiffs, ) ) Judge Michael R. Barrett vs. ) ) David Yost, et al., each in their official ) capacity as well as their employees, ) agents, and successors, ) ) Defendants. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL RECONSIDERATION OF PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION ORDER This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs’ Motion for Partial Reconsideration (Doc. 55) of the Preliminary Injunction Order entered on April 18, 2019. At that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pa. v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood of Northern New Eng.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Rodriguez v. Tennessee Laborers Health & Welfare FundCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  4. Louisville/Jefferson County Metro Government v. Hotels.com, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  5. Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Ass'n, Inc. v. Arctic Exp., Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2003

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API