Legal Opinion
Olson v. Bismarck Parks & Recreation District
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided April 16, 2002No. 20010249PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KAPSNER, Justice.
[¶ 1] Kathleen A. Olson and Amy Howard appealed from a summary judgment dismissing their negligence action against the Bismarck Parks and Recreation District (“District”) because the District was immune from suit. We conclude, under the circumstances of this case, the limited liability afforded the District for recreational use of property under N.D.C.C. ch. 53-08 does not violate the equal protection provisions of N.D. Const, art. 1, § 21, and we affirm.
I
[¶ 2] On November 26, 2000, Olson and Howard were seriously injured while sledding on a hill at Bismarck’s Tom O’Leary…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Jerome Otteson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
- Hanson v. Williams CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. BurrNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. MorrisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- Asbury Hospital v. Cass CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1943
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Teigen v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Feland v. P.F.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Kimberly Ann Sallee, Individually and as Next Friend of Lucas Gregory Durkop and Maria Christina Rivera, Matthew James Sallee, and James Allan Sallee v. Matthew R. Stewart and Diana Stewart D/B/A Stewartland HolsteinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
- Grand Forks Professional Baseball, Inc. v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Hoffner v. JohnsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.