Teigen v. State
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KAPSNER, Justice.
[¶ 1] James Teigen, Deb Lundgren, Greg Svenningsen, the North Dakota Farmers Union, and the Dakota Resource Council (collectively “plaintiff's”) appeal from a summary judgment dismissing their declaratory judgment action. Plaintiffs challenge the constitutionality of language in N.D.C.C. §§ 4-28-07(4) and 4-28-07.1(4) requiring the North Dakota State Wheat Commission to expend at least two mills of a wheat tax for “contract[s] for activities related to domestic wheat policy issues, wheat production, promotion, and sales” and providing “[t]he contracts may be with no more than…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Bowsher v. SynarSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- County of Stutsman v. State Historical Society of North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- Van Grinsven v. G.R.H.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. First State Bank of JudNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- State v. HolbachNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. BluntNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. KurucNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- Hale v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
- Sorum v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.