Legal Opinion

Teigen v. State

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 2008No. 20070134PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KAPSNER, Justice.

[¶ 1] James Teigen, Deb Lundgren, Greg Svenningsen, the North Dakota Farmers Union, and the Dakota Resource Council (collectively “plaintiff's”) appeal from a summary judgment dismissing their declaratory judgment action. Plaintiffs challenge the constitutionality of language in N.D.C.C. §§ 4-28-07(4) and 4-28-07.1(4) requiring the North Dakota State Wheat Commission to expend at least two mills of a wheat tax for “contract[s] for activities related to domestic wheat policy issues, wheat production, promotion, and sales” and providing “[t]he contracts may be with no more than…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Bowsher v. SynarSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. County of Stutsman v. State Historical Society of North DakotaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Van Grinsven v. G.R.H.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. First State Bank of JudNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. State v. HolbachNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. BluntNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State v. KurucNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Hale v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Sorum v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API