Legal Opinion

Adkins v. Watrous

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided May 26, 1982No. 80-1-188, CA A20793PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYoung, J.

Defendants appeal from an order of the trial court denying their motion to set aside an order of default and judgment. The issue is whether substituted service of the summons and complaint on the individual defendants and the foreign corporate defendant Nemaia Ranches, LTD. (Nemaia) was effective under ORCP 7. The first consideration, however, is to determine if this court has jurisdiction to hear this appeal under former ORS 19.010(2) (e) and ORS 18.125.

Plaintiff filed a complaint naming as defendants the named individuals and Heavenly Valley, Inc. (Heavenly).1 Heavenly appeared by filing an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Industrial Leasing Corp. v. Van DykeOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Hill v. OlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  3. Jones v. Tri-State Realty, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Litvin v. EngesetherCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  2. Adkins v. WatrousCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  3. Valdez v. TimmermanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. SommerholderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API