Legal Opinion

Hill v. Oland

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 15, 1981No. 78-0088, CA 16990PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarden, J.

This appeal by plaintiffs is from the trial court’s decree denying their prayer for specific performance of an alleged contract between themselves, as buyers, and defendants, as sellers, of real property. In the first cause of suit plaintiffs alleged that the contract was actually entered into by defendant Mr. Oland, only, on behalf of both defendants. This cause was severed and was tried separately. Plaintiffs’ other two causes of action are still pending. Plaintiffs’ second cause of action is for damages for trespass to land and removal of timber. Plaintiffs’ third cause of action is for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Industrial Leasing Corp. v. Van DykeOregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Portland Electric & Plumbing Co. v. CookeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  3. Kuvaas v. CutrellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Shaughnessy v. SprayCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  2. Papen v. KarpowCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  3. Litvin v. EngesetherCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  4. May v. Josephine Memorial Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
  5. State v. ChristophersonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API