Legal Opinion

Adkins v. Watrous

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 21, 1983No. 80-1-188; CA A26478PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

This is defendants’ second appeal from a trial court order denying their motion to set aside a default judgment. Their first appeal was dismissed because the judgment was not final. Adkins v. Watrous, 57 Or App 541, 645 P2d 591 (1982). The issue is whether there was effective substituted service on the individual defendants (defendants) and on a corporate defendant, Nemaia Ranches, LTD. (Nemaia). We conclude that there was not and reverse and remand with instructions to set aside the default judgment.

Plaintiff attempted substituted service on defendants by serving a copy of a summons and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Kalich v. BrysonOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Kenner v. SchmidtOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Adkins v. WatrousCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  4. South State Investment Co. v. BrigumOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  5. South State Investment Co. v. BrigumCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Yen Linh Thi Pham v. FaberCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1998
  2. Option One Mortgage Corp. v. WallCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  3. Lake Oswego Review, Inc. v. SteinkampCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  4. Abdulhadi v. Bavarian Auto Sales, L.L.C.Goochland County Circuit Court · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API