Legal Opinion

Claim of Masucci v. Conforti & Eisele, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 29, 1968No. Motion No. 9791PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAulisi, J.

Appeal by employer from a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Board, filed June 22, 1966, which awarded double compensation pursuant to section 14-a of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. Claimant was injured on September 8, 1965 when metal doors fell on him while he was working for appellant. It is conceded that at the time of the accident claimant was under the age of 18 years and appellant failed to require or have on file an employment certificate. This was a violation of sections 132 and 135 (formerly §§ 130, 131) of the Labor Law. Appellant contends that section 14-a is unconstitutional…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Claim of Sackolwitz v. Charles Hamburg & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1946
  2. Matter of Sacripante v. United Metal Spinning Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
  3. Claim of Carney v. Williams Press Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
  4. Claim of Russel v. 231 Lexington Avenue Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932
  5. Matter of Alino v. French Bottling Works, St. Ins. FundNew York Court of Appeals · 1949

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Claim of Robles v. Mossgood Theatre-Saunders RealtyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  2. Cruz v. RKO Century TheatresAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API