Legal Opinion

Claim of Carney v. Williams Press Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 17, 1952PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrewster, J.

Claimant suffered compensable injuries which arose out of and in the course of his employment by appellant at a time when he was sixteen years of age. The appeal tenders only the issue as to the propriety and legality of the increased compensation which has been awarded to him under section 14-a of the Workmen’s Compensation Law upon the ground that at the time of the accident he “was illegally employed in violation of Section 131 and Section 132 of the Labor Law.” The facts which present the issue are not in dispute. Claimant had duly and lawfully obtained a valid “ standard employment…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Claim of Sackolwitz v. Charles Hamburg & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1946
  2. Matter of Sacripante v. United Metal Spinning Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1949
  3. Matter of Braiter v. Addie Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1940

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Willis v. StoreySupreme Court of Alabama · 1958
  2. Claim of Salvio v. Abercrombie & Fitch Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1972
  3. Claim of Masucci v. Conforti & Eisele, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API