Legal Opinion

Claim of Russel v. 231 Lexington Avenue Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 1, 1932PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal by the insurance carrier and the

employer, separately, involves a double indemnity award against the employer as well as an award for ordinary compensation payable by the carrier. A further complication arises out of the fact that there was a third party action brought by the father of the deceased, as administrator, against 231 Lexington Avenue Corporation (hereinafter termed the corporation) and a painter named Nelson. Such action was brought in the Federal court and was settled out of court by the corporation through its insurance company (the present insurance carrier) paying…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Claim of Zirpola v. T. & E. Casselman, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1924
  2. O'Brien v. LodiNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  3. Claim of Wagner v. Wilson & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
  4. Matter of Clow v. B.F. Keith's Fordham TheatreNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  5. Claim of Adleman v. William Armstrong Publishing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Claim of Masucci v. Conforti & Eisele, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
  2. In re the Estate of BeaneyNew York Supreme Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API