Legal Opinion
Claim of Sackolwitz v. Charles Hamburg & Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided April 18, 1946PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDesmond, J.
Claimant Leo Sacklowitz was injured while working, under the name of his older brother Jack Sacklowitz, for the employer-respondent. When applying for the job, claimant had presented a referral card issued to his brother by an employment agency, and, when asked by the employer for his social security number, had given the number of his brother. In fact, claimant was under, while his brother was over, eighteen years of age. The employment of one under eighteen years of age in respondent’s factory was prohibited by sections 130 and 131 of the Labor Law. The Industrial Board - allowed claimant…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Westchester Lighting Co. v. Westchester County Small Estates Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Surace v. DannaNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- People Ex Rel. Price v. Sheffield Farms-Slawson-Decker Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Matter of Post v. . Burger GohlkeNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- International Text Book Co. v. . ConnellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Claim of Richardson v. Fiedler Roofing, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Matter of Industrial Comr. (Siguin) v. McCarthyNew York Court of Appeals · 1946
- Majlinger v. Cassino Contracting Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Halfacre v. Paragon Bridge & Steel Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1962
- Jara v. Strong Steel Door, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.