Sugarland Industries, Inc. v. Falco
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
TIREY, Justice.
Plaintiffs grounded their action upon a knowingly fraudulent misrepresentation of the germination rate of certain cotton seed which was sold by defendant to them. The jury, in its verdict, found substantially that defendant represented to the plaintiffs that the seed had a germination rate of 80%, and that the plaintiffs relied on such representation; that such representation induced the plaintiffs to purchase the seed, and that defendant intended for such representation to induce them to purchase the seed; that Rufus Phillips was the Manager of a department of the business of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Henry v. PhillipsTexas Supreme Court · 1912
- Dallas Railway & Terminal Company v. GossettTexas Supreme Court · 1956
- Aetna Insurance v. KleinTexas Supreme Court · 1959
- Aetna Insurance Co. v. KleinTexas Supreme Court · 1959
- Edgar v. Joseph Breck & Sons Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Two Rivers Company v. Curtiss Breeding Service, Division of Searle Agriculture Inc., Defendant- Hi-Pro Feeds, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Hartwig Farms, Inc. v. Pacific Gamble Robinson Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1981
- Asgrow Seed Company v. GulickCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
- St. Paul Mercury Insurance Co. v. Sugarland Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1966
- Willoughby v. Ciba-Geigy Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1979
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.