St. Paul Mercury Insurance Co. v. Sugarland Industries, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
WALTER, Justice.
J. T. Falco and others purchased cotton seed from Sugarland Industries. Sugarland represented to Falco that the seed had a germination rate of 80%. Falco filed suit against Sugarland for lost profits because the seed did not have a germination rate of 80%. Sugarland called upon St. Paul Insurance Company to defend such suit because, it contended, it was covered by a policy which it had with St. Paul. The insurance company denied coverage and refused to defend. Sugarland provided its own defense and lost the case, which is reported in 360 S.W.2d 806, Sugarland Industries, Inc.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hauenstein v. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1954
- Kelley v. American Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1958
- Orkin Exterminating Co. v. Massachusetts Bonding & Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1966
- Vaughn v. Atlantic Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
- American Insurance v. KelleyTexas Supreme Court · 1959
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Cortez v. CortezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
- General Insurance Co. of America v. GaugerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
- Stevens Industries, Inc. v. Maryland Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- West Texas Utilities Company v. BergstromCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
- Frymire Engineering Company, Inc. v. GranthamCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.