Legal Opinion
Two Rivers Company v. Curtiss Breeding Service, Division of Searle Agriculture Inc., Defendant- Hi-Pro Feeds, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided August 25, 1980No. 78-1014PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THORNBERRY, Circuit Judge:
This action was brought by Two Rivers Company (Two Rivers), alleging that it purchased from Hi-Pro Feeds, Inc. (Hi-Pro) semen used for artificial insemination of its cattle, and that the semen caused syndac-tylism in the offspring of its cattle. The semen was marketed by Curtiss Breeding Service, Division of Searle Agriculture, Inc. (Curtiss). Two Rivers’ claim for damages against Curtiss and Hi-Pro is based on the doctrines of strict liability and implied warranty.
*1244This appeal arises from a jury verdict in favor of Two Rivers. The jury apparently found that Curtiss…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- The Boeing Company v. Daniel C. ShipmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Seely v. White Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Clarence Borel v. Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, Nationalsurety Corporation, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- McKisson v. Sales Affiliates, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1967
- Rourke v. GarzaTexas Supreme Court · 1975
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- Pennsylvania Glass Sand Corporation v. Caterpillar Tractor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Berkeley Pump Co. v. Reed-Joseph Land Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
- Robert F. Roscello v. Southwest Airlines Company and International Association of MacHinists & Aerospace Workers, Afl-Cio, Airline District 146Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- James Garland Carter v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Preston B. Purvis v. Consolidated Energy Products Company, a Division of Condec CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.