Legal Opinion

Hicks v. Arthur

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 7, 1995No. Civ. A. 93-3160PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

JOYNER, District Judge.

Today we decide Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. The facts of this case are somewhat confusing to relate, due to the fact that each Plaintiff’s cause of action for race discrimination under 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (1994) is against different Defendants and stem from different events, each taking place at a different time. In addition, one Plaintiff also brings a sex discrimination claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e — 2000e-17 (1994). In the interest of clarity, we will first state the general caselaw applicable to this…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Luis A. Fuentes v. Steven P. Perskie, Chairman of the New Jersey Casino Control Commission the New Jersey Casino Control CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  3. Abraham WELDON, Appellant, v. KRAFT, INC.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
  4. Ted JOSEY, Appellant, v. JOHN R. HOLLINGSWORTH CORPORATION, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  5. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Metal Service CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Joseph v. Continental Airlines, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
  2. Rajbahadoorsingh v. Chase Manhattan Bank, NA.District Court, Virgin Islands · 2001
  3. Fucci v. Graduate HospitalDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
  4. Rose v. Woolworth Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Fitzpatrick v. National Mobile TelevisionDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2005

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API